Harper v. Hesterlee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Harper v. Hesterlee

123 S.E. 266, 158 Ga. 347, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 152

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harper v. Hesterlee. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Ga. 251 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1924·No. No. 4208·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The only ground of the motion for a new trial, other than the general grounds, complains that the court erred in not continuing the case. This ground was not approved by the court. On the contrary the court certifies that there was no motion made for a continuance at tlie time of the trial of the case. It follows that this ground of the. motion is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

All ihe Jitstices concur. 8. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. J. 8. Hdwards and Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The only ground of the motion for a new trial, other than the general grounds, complains that the court erred in not continuing the case. This ground was not approved by the court. On the contrary the court certifies that there was no motion made for a continuance at tlie time of the trial of the case. It follows that this ground of the. motion is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

All ihe Jitstices concur. 8. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. J. 8. Hdwards and Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Harper v. Hesterlee, 123 S.E. 266, 158 Ga. 347, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 152 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

123 S.E. 266 (Harper v. Hesterlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.