Harper v. Hesterlee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Harper v. Hesterlee

123 S.E. 266, 158 Ga. 347, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 152

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1924

DocketNo. 4208

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 266 (Harper v. Hesterlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. Hesterlee, 123 S.E. 266, 158 Ga. 347, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 152 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The only ground of the motion for a new trial, other than the general grounds, complains that the court erred in not continuing the case. This ground was not approved by the court. On the contrary the court certifies that there was no motion made for a continuance at tlie time of the trial of the case. It follows that this ground of the. motion is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

All ihe Jitstices concur. 8. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. J. 8. Hdwards and Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The only ground of the motion for a new trial, other than the general grounds, complains that the court erred in not continuing the case. This ground was not approved by the court. On the contrary the court certifies that there was no motion made for a continuance at tlie time of the trial of the case. It follows that this ground of the. motion is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

All ihe Jitstices concur. 8. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. J. 8. Hdwards and Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 266, 158 Ga. 347, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-hesterlee-ga-1924.