Harper v. Harper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harper v. Harper

38 A.D.2d 971, 331 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5075

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 971 (Harper v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. Harper, 38 A.D.2d 971, 331 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 461 of the Family Court Act to modify a Mexican divorce decree with respect to the provisions for the support of petitioner and the parties’ children, in which respondent made a cross application for similar relief, each of the parties appeals from (1) the separate portion of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 22, 1971, which denied her or his application and (2) the portion of a [972]*972further order of said court, dated April 27, 1971, which, on reargument, adhered to the original determination as to her or him. Appeals from order dated March 22, 1971 dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated April 27, 1971 reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a hearing and a new determination. In our opinion, the circumstances and the interests of justice are such as to warrant a hearing and a new determination. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to section 461 of the Family Court Act to modify a Mexican divorce decree with respect to the provisions for the support of petitioner and the parties’ children, in which respondent made a cross application for similar relief, each of the parties appeals from (1) the separate portion of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 22, 1971, which denied her or his application and (2) the portion of a [972]*972further order of said court, dated April 27, 1971, which, on reargument, adhered to the original determination as to her or him. Appeals from order dated March 22, 1971 dismissed as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated April 27, 1971 reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a hearing and a new determination. In our opinion, the circumstances and the interests of justice are such as to warrant a hearing and a new determination. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 971, 331 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-harper-nyappdiv-1972.