Harper v. Harper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Harper v. Harper

107 So. 2d 704, 236 La. 458, 1958 La. LEXIS 1320

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 15, 1958·No. No. 44329·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Samuel B. Harper, alleging that he had been granted a suspensive and devolutive appeal from a judgment granting his wife a separation from bed and board and alimony and that Mr. Robert T. Russ, the court reporter who took down the testimony during the trial of this case, died before he had an opportunity to transcribe his notes, thus making it impossible for appellant to complete the record, filed a motion to remand this case to the lower court for a new trial in order that the evidence may be taken down and brought to this court for inspection and consideration. Appellee admits that the foregoing facts are true and correct, but opposes the motion on the ground that appellant failed to comply with the provisions of Articles 601, 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice.¹

Under the provisions of Article 906 of the Code of Practice² appellant is clearly entitled to the relief sought here. Duprat v. Powell, 162 La. 859, 111 So. 259; Dreher v. Guaranty Bond & Finance Co., 188 La. 421, 177 So. 259. From a mere reading of Articles 601, 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice it is readily seen that they are [706] inapplicable where the testimony of the witnesses has been taken down in writing as in the instant case. See Kenabrew v. Schneider, La.App., 45 So.2d 555; St. Romain v. Bordelon, La.App., 77 So.2d 421.

The judgment appealed from is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court to be tried de novo; all costs, including costs of this appeal, to await the final disposition of the suit.

Footnotes

602. “Statement of facts — Preparar tion by parties.- — When the deposition of witnesses have not been taken in writing in the inferior court, the party intending to appeal, or his advocate, must require the adverse party or his advocate, to draw, jointly with him, a statement of the facts proved in the 'cause, and this statement thus drawn and signed, either by the parties or their advocates, shall be annexed to the records, and a transcript of the same transmitted to the Supreme Court.”

603. “Statement of facts — Preparation by court — Parties disagreeing.— If the adverse party, when required to do so, refuse to join in making out the statement of facts, or if the parties can not agree as to the manner of drawing the same, the court, at the request of either, shall make such statement according to their recollection of the facts, or from the notes they have taken of the evidence.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Samuel B. Harper, alleging that he had been granted a suspensive and devolutive appeal from a judgment granting his wife a separation from bed and board and alimony and that Mr. Robert T. Russ, the court reporter who took down the testimony during the trial of this case, died before he had an opportunity to transcribe his notes, thus making it impossible for appellant to complete the record, filed a motion to remand this case to the lower court for a new trial in order that the evidence may be taken down and brought to this court for inspection and consideration. Appellee admits that the foregoing facts are true and correct, but opposes the motion on the ground that appellant failed to comply with the provisions of Articles 601, 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice.¹

Under the provisions of Article 906 of the Code of Practice² appellant is clearly entitled to the relief sought here. Duprat v. Powell, 162 La. 859, 111 So. 259; Dreher v. Guaranty Bond & Finance Co., 188 La. 421, 177 So. 259. From a mere reading of Articles 601, 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice it is readily seen that they are [706] inapplicable where the testimony of the witnesses has been taken down in writing as in the instant case. See Kenabrew v. Schneider, La.App., 45 So.2d 555; St. Romain v. Bordelon, La.App., 77 So.2d 421.

The judgment appealed from is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court to be tried de novo; all costs, including costs of this appeal, to await the final disposition of the suit.

Footnotes

602. “Statement of facts — Preparar tion by parties.- — When the deposition of witnesses have not been taken in writing in the inferior court, the party intending to appeal, or his advocate, must require the adverse party or his advocate, to draw, jointly with him, a statement of the facts proved in the 'cause, and this statement thus drawn and signed, either by the parties or their advocates, shall be annexed to the records, and a transcript of the same transmitted to the Supreme Court.”

603. “Statement of facts — Preparation by court — Parties disagreeing.— If the adverse party, when required to do so, refuse to join in making out the statement of facts, or if the parties can not agree as to the manner of drawing the same, the court, at the request of either, shall make such statement according to their recollection of the facts, or from the notes they have taken of the evidence.”

Harper v. Harper, 107 So. 2d 704, 236 La. 458, 1958 La. LEXIS 1320 (La. 1958).

Pincite

107 So. 2d 704 (Harper v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related