Harper v. Hampton

1 H. & J. 622
General Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1805·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

The court are of opinion, and so direct the jury,'that the tender- of the bond to the. defendant in the manner stated, and the refusal of it by the defendant, ought not in any manner to influence or affect the decision of this case, nor the verdict of the jury thereon. The plaintiff excepted. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals; and the case was argued in that court at-June term 1808, by Martin and Key, for the Appellant., and the Appellant in proper person; and by Johnson, (Attorney-General,) and Magruder, for the Appellee, before Tilghman, Nicholson and Gantt, J. It was continued under curia ad. 'cult, and in consequence of the death of Judge Tilghman, until December term 1809, when the Appellant dismissed his appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. Hampton, 1 H. & J. 622 (Va. Super. Ct. 1805).

1 H. & J. 622 (Harper v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slicing Machine Co., Inc. v. Murphy
158 A. 26 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
Peter v. Peter
110 A. 211 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1920)
Wanamaker v. Bowes
36 Md. 42 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1872)
Taylor v. Turley
33 Md. 500 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1871)
Jones v. Jones
18 Ala. 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)