Harper v. Glazier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Harper v. Glazier

162 So. 79, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 603

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 14, 1935

DocketNo. 1509.

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 79 (Harper v. Glazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. Glazier, 162 So. 79, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 603 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

LE BLANC, Judge.

The plaintiff sues the three defendants herein for damages for the alleged removal of certain personal property which he claims to own and which formerly comprised a sawmill, from a mill site at Robert in the parish of Tangipahoa. The value of each article is itemized in detail, the whole amounting to the sum of $2,310.

He prays for judgment in the said amount of $2,310, with 5 per cent, per an-num interest, against the three defendants in solido.

It is apparent that the demand is for an amount beyond that with which this court is vested with jurisdiction in a suit of this nature, and it is necessary, therefore, that the case be transferred to the Supreme Court.

For these reasons, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court of the state, within 30 days from the date on which this decree becomes final.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LE BLANC, Judge.

The plaintiff sues the three defendants herein for damages for the alleged removal of certain personal property which he claims to own and which formerly comprised a sawmill, from a mill site at Robert in the parish of Tangipahoa. The value of each article is itemized in detail, the whole amounting to the sum of $2,310.

He prays for judgment in the said amount of $2,310, with 5 per cent, per an-num interest, against the three defendants in solido.

It is apparent that the demand is for an amount beyond that with which this court is vested with jurisdiction in a suit of this nature, and it is necessary, therefore, that the case be transferred to the Supreme Court.

For these reasons, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court of the state, within 30 days from the date on which this decree becomes final.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 79, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-glazier-lactapp-1935.