Harper v. Freelon

6 Cal. 76
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 76 (Harper v. Freelon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Freelon, 6 Cal. 76 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

Cases in insolvency under the Insolvent Debtor’s Act of 1852, are special cases within the meaning of the Constitution, and the jurisdiction of which the Legislature has the right to dispose of and vest in any of the Courts of this State of original civil jurisdiction.

In the exercise of a legitimate power, the Legislature has given jurisdiction in these cases to both the District and County Courts, and these Courts hold it concurrently. There is no reason therefore for the refusal of the County Judge to proceed upon the petition of the apellant, and the mandamus must he made peremptory. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNiel v. Borland
23 Cal. 144 (California Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-freelon-cal-1856.