Harper v. Fox

396 F. App'x 57
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2010·No. No. 09-41234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Don A. Harper, federal prisoner #24496-013, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged his convictions for armed bank robbery and for using or carrying a firearm during the robbery. The district court determined that Harper could not proceed under Section 2241 because his claims did not satisfy the requirements of the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Harper’s brief is entirely devoted to the merits of his claims for relief. Harper has not argued, much less shown, that he is entitled to proceed under Section 2241 based on the savings clause of Section 2255(e). See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 900-01, 904 (5th Cir.2001). Harper has waived the issue by failing to brief it. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Harper’s emergency motion for affirmative relief is DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. Fox, 396 F. App'x 57 (5th Cir. 2010).

396 F. App'x 57 (Harper v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related