Harper v. . Dowdney
21 N.E. 63, 113 N.Y. 644, 68 Sickels 644, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1024
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harper v. . Dowdney, 21 N.E. 63, 113 N.Y. 644, 68 Sickels 644, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. 1889).
21 N.E. 63 (Harper v. . Dowdney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mandracchia v. McKee
8 Misc. 2d 965 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Bruns v. Opel
27 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 212 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1928)
Frankel v. Blank
213 N.W. 597 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1927)
Bailey v. Levy
104 So. 415 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Flajole v. Schulze
141 P. 1026 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Etta Contracting Co. v. Bruning
63 So. 619 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Feder v. Rosenthal
62 Misc. 610 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Mandel v. Weschler
128 A.D. 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Knowles v. Temple
96 P. 1 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)
Everett v. Marston
85 S.W. 540 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Cemansky v. Fitch
96 N.W. 754 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Green v. Tidball
55 L.R.A. 879 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
Hastings v. Twenty-Third Ward Land Improvement Co.
46 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
McLaughlin v. . Miller
26 N.E. 1104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
People ex rel. Osborn v. Gilon
9 N.Y.S. 212 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Kinsella v. City of Auburn
4 Silv. Sup. 101 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)