Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts

220 F. App'x 171
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2007
Docket06-8033
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 F. App'x 171 (Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts, 220 F. App'x 171 (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Gene Harper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harper v. Currituck County Clerk of Courts, No. 5:06-ct-03004 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunmore v. Hamilton
W.D. Virginia, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F. App'x 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-currituck-county-clerk-of-courts-ca4-2007.