Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

341 S.W.3d 889, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 2011
DocketED 95571
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 S.W.3d 889 (Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 341 S.W.3d 889, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dana Harper appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. We find that the Commission did not err in its decision.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coons v. Coons
341 S.W.3d 889 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 S.W.3d 889, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-connecticut-general-life-insurance-company-moctapp-2011.