Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
341 S.W.3d 889, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733
Opinion
ORDER
Dana Harper appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. We find that the Commission did not err in its decision.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 341 S.W.3d 889, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
341 S.W.3d 889 (Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coons v. Coons
341 S.W.3d 889 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)