Harper v. Biles

8 A. 446, 115 Pa. 594, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 352
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 7, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 8 A. 446 (Harper v. Biles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Biles, 8 A. 446, 115 Pa. 594, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 352 (Pa. 1887).

Opinion

[599]*599The opinion of the court was filed March 7th, 1887.

Pee Curiam.

— The reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge clearly justify the court in refusing to strike oft the judgment. Not only were the laches too great, under the undisputed facts, for the defendant below to successfully invoke the aid of the equitable power of the court, but the judgment had also been regularly and duly revived: Duff v. Wynkoop, 74 Pa. St., 305.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keiper v. Keiper
494 A.2d 454 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Osttowski v. Smith
461 A.2d 1301 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Osenider
193 A. 284 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
United States Brewing Co. v. Epp
247 Ill. App. 315 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Mayer Furniture Co. v. Putt
3 Pa. D. & C. 542 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Rakowski v. Rosenthal
109 A. 612 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Osterhout v. Briggs
37 Pa. Super. 169 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Einstein's Sons & Leffler v. Davidson
35 Fla. 342 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A. 446, 115 Pa. 594, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-biles-pa-1887.