Harper v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
This text of 77 S.E. 415 (Harper v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe only error assigned is to tbe following charge: “You may, in your discretion, allow interest upon any damages awarded to tbe plaintiff from tbe date of tbe fire or from any intervening date, in your discretion. It is not recoverable as a matter of right, and rests in tbe sound discretion of tbe jury.”
Damages recovered for a tort do not as a matter of law bear interest until after judgment, but when tbe tort consists solely in tbe destruction of property, and not in personal injuries, ibis Court has held that tbe jury may in their discretion give interest on tbe value of tbe property destroyed from tbe date of its destruction, in addition to tbe actual value of tbe property. Rippey v. Miller, 46 N. C., 480; Guano Co. v. Magee, 86 N. C., 351; Williams v. Lumber Co., 118 N. C., 928; Lane v. Butler, 135 N. C., 419; Stephenson v. Koonce, 103 N. C., 266; Wilson v. Troy, 18 L. R. A., 449, and notes.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E. 415, 161 N.C. 451, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1913.