Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel

448 So. 2d 587, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12636
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1984·No. No. 83-856·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and a judgment denying counterclaim in that suit.

The sole simple issue for us to decide is whether the appellant is entitled to an attorney’s fee for defending the counterclaim it won. The answer is no because the counterclaim was for damages, not a mechanic’s lien. Just because the main action was for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien (which appellant lost) does not mean appellant is entitled to a fee under Section 713.-29. It is only the victor in the lien action who is entitled to a fee. Appellant was not the victor.

Affirmed.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and'CO-WART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel, 448 So. 2d 587, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12636 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

448 So. 2d 587 (Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CDI CONTRACTORS, LLC. v. Allbrite Elec. Contractors, Inc.
836 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
R.C. Steel Placing Co. v. Volpe Construction Co.
565 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. VOLPE CONST., CO.
511 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)