Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel

448 So. 2d 587, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12636
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 1984
DocketNo. 83-856
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 587 (Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Noel, 448 So. 2d 587, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12636 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and a judgment denying counterclaim in that suit.

The sole simple issue for us to decide is whether the appellant is entitled to an attorney’s fee for defending the counterclaim it won. The answer is no because the counterclaim was for damages, not a mechanic’s lien. Just because the main action was for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien (which appellant lost) does not mean appellant is entitled to a fee under Section 713.-29. It is only the victor in the lien action who is entitled to a fee. Appellant was not the victor.

Affirmed.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and'CO-WART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CDI CONTRACTORS, LLC. v. Allbrite Elec. Contractors, Inc.
836 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
R.C. Steel Placing Co. v. Volpe Construction Co.
565 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. VOLPE CONST., CO.
511 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 587, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-plumbing-heating-co-v-noel-fladistctapp-1984.