Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 13, 2015·No. 118 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

LAWRENCE HARPER, : No. 118 EM 2015 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF : PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY CLERK OF : THE COURT (CRIM. DIV.) AND : PRESIDENT JUDGE PAMELA PRIOR : DEMBE, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is

not permitted) The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of

record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co., (Pa. 2015).

Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co. (Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)