Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co.
This text of Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co. (Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LAWRENCE HARPER, : No. 118 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COMMON PLEAS COURT OF : PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY CLERK OF : THE COURT (CRIM. DIV.) AND : PRESIDENT JUDGE PAMELA PRIOR : DEMBE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2015, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
not permitted) The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harper, L. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Phl. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-l-v-ct-com-pl-phl-co-pa-2015.