HARPER, JR., HORACE, PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 2, 2015
DocketKA 13-00460
StatusPublished

This text of HARPER, JR., HORACE, PEOPLE v (HARPER, JR., HORACE, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HARPER, JR., HORACE, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1377 KA 13-00460 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HORACE HARPER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KARIM A. ABDULLA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered June 7, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence because no mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant’s right to appeal his conviction that he was also waiving his right to appeal any issue concerning the severity of the sentence (see People v Peterson, 111 AD3d 1412, 1412; People v Pimentel, 108 AD3d 861, 862, lv denied 21 NY3d 1076). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pimentel
108 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Peterson
111 A.D.3d 1412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
HARPER, JR., HORACE, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-jr-horace-people-v-nyappdiv-2015.