Harp v. State
122 S.E. 650, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
This text of 122 S.E. 650 (Harp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harp v. State, 122 S.E. 650, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled. See Lindsay v. State, 32 Ga. App. 74 (122 S. E. 649).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lindsay v. State
122 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 650, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harp-v-state-gactapp-1924.