Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Harp v. State

Harp v. State

122 S.E. 650, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1924·No. 15340·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled. See Lindsay v. State, 32 Ga. App. 74 (122 S. E. 649).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harp v. State, 122 S.E. 650, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

122 S.E. 650 (Harp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindsay v. State
122 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)