Harp v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Harp v. State

852 S.W.2d 138, 313 Ark. 168, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 278

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 10, 1993·No. CR 92-1484·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s brief was due on February 9, 1993. No brief has been filed or tendered and no extension of time has been requested. On April 14, 1993, the Attorney General moved for an order dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Faber DeWitt Jenkins, Jr., is hereby ordered to appear before this court on Monday, May 17, 1993, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to prosecute this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s brief was due on February 9, 1993. No brief has been filed or tendered and no extension of time has been requested. On April 14, 1993, the Attorney General moved for an order dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Faber DeWitt Jenkins, Jr., is hereby ordered to appear before this court on Monday, May 17, 1993, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to prosecute this appeal.

Harp v. State, 852 S.W.2d 138, 313 Ark. 168, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 278 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

852 S.W.2d 138 (Harp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.