Harp v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Harp v. State

852 S.W.2d 138, 313 Ark. 168, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 278

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 10, 1993

DocketCR 92-1484

StatusPublished

This text of 852 S.W.2d 138 (Harp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harp v. State, 852 S.W.2d 138, 313 Ark. 168, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 278 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s brief was due on February 9, 1993. No brief has been filed or tendered and no extension of time has been requested. On April 14, 1993, the Attorney General moved for an order dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Faber DeWitt Jenkins, Jr., is hereby ordered to appear before this court on Monday, May 17, 1993, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to prosecute this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s brief was due on February 9, 1993. No brief has been filed or tendered and no extension of time has been requested. On April 14, 1993, the Attorney General moved for an order dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute. Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Faber DeWitt Jenkins, Jr., is hereby ordered to appear before this court on Monday, May 17, 1993, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to prosecute this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

852 S.W.2d 138, 313 Ark. 168, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harp-v-state-ark-1993.