Harp v. Ruprecht

455 N.W.2d 176, 235 Neb. 346, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 148
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMay 18, 1990
DocketNo. 88-285
StatusPublished

This text of 455 N.W.2d 176 (Harp v. Ruprecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harp v. Ruprecht, 455 N.W.2d 176, 235 Neb. 346, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 148 (Neb. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon our consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that a question exists as to a material fact or the inference to be drawn therefrom, and, accordingly, the defendant was not entitled to summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 N.W.2d 176, 235 Neb. 346, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harp-v-ruprecht-neb-1990.