Harp v. Nowell

94 S.E. 885, 147 Ga. 560, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 33

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 18, 1918·No. No. 110·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

There being issues of fact for the jury to determine, it was erroneous to direct a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O, J., absent.

Ejectment. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. December 8, 1916.

Feagin & Hancock, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harp v. Nowell, 94 S.E. 885, 147 Ga. 560, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 33 (Ga. 1918).

Pincite

94 S.E. 885 (Harp v. Nowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.