Harp v. Kerlin
This text of 92 S.E. 286 (Harp v. Kerlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence to sustain a finding in favor of the plaintiff as to at least one of the alleged acts of negligence for which a recovery was sought; pain and suffering could be inferred from the nature and character of the wound inflicted upon the plaintiff (a child of tender years), which rendered him unconscious fora time, from which he bled profusely, and which necessitated his removal to a hospital, and a recovery was authorized therefor; the motion for a new trial is based only on the general grounds as to the sufficiency of the evidence, and the evidence as a whole sufficiently supports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 286, 19 Ga. App. 794, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harp-v-kerlin-gactapp-1917.