Harp Group, Inc. v. Leins

946 So. 2d 571, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20771, 2006 WL 3615489
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 13, 2006
DocketNo. 3D06-2242
StatusPublished

This text of 946 So. 2d 571 (Harp Group, Inc. v. Leins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harp Group, Inc. v. Leins, 946 So. 2d 571, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20771, 2006 WL 3615489 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee’s motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction below was granted without an evidentiary hearing on the ground that the court lacked “jurisdiction.” This was clearly erroneous since the court possessed both subject matter jurisdiction of a proceeding for injunction, see Sirgany Int’l, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, 887 So.2d 381, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), and personal jurisdiction over the defendant-appellee through personal service in Florida. The order on appeal is therefore reversed and the preliminary injunction reinstated forthwith pending a full hearing on the merits of the motion to dissolve the injunction.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SIRGANY INTERN., INC. v. Miami-Dade County
887 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 So. 2d 571, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20771, 2006 WL 3615489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harp-group-inc-v-leins-fladistctapp-2006.