Harosym v. St. John's Greek Catholic Church

239 A.D. 563, 267 N.Y.S. 906, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8099
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, a parishioner, could not in an action for a declaratory judgment question the corporate organization of [564] the appellant church. It matters not whether the action is one for a declaratory judgment, or for injunction or other equitable relief. The right to question the validity of the corporate organization rests solely under our law in the Attorney-General. Neither does the plaintiff show any right to question the standing as officers of the sundry individual defendants. The plaintiff in this respect must at least first proceed within the corporate organization itself by notice and demand to the acting officers for a new election.

Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., not sitting.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harosym v. St. John's Greek Catholic Church, 239 A.D. 563, 267 N.Y.S. 906, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

239 A.D. 563 (Harosym v. St. John's Greek Catholic Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Agudist Council v. Imperial Sales Co.
158 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Rodyk v. Ukrainian Autocephalic Orthodox Church of St. Volodimir, Inc.
31 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Archinal v. Reuss
46 Misc. 2d 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
In re Kaminsky
251 A.D. 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)