Harold's Delicatessen & Restaurant, Inc. v. Stein

240 A.D. 780

This text of 240 A.D. 780 (Harold's Delicatessen & Restaurant, Inc. v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold's Delicatessen & Restaurant, Inc. v. Stein, 240 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment granting permanent injunction modified to the extent of restraining the defendants from carrying or displaying signs bearing the inscription in words or in substance that plaintiff refuses to employ union help or that plaintiff’s employees are on strike, and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs. The evidence fails to support so much of the judgment as determines that defendants had been coercing, threatening, assaulting or intimidating and turning aside against their will plaintiff’s patrons or their [its] employees; nor is the judgment proper in so far as it enjoins [781]*781defendants from persuading plaintiff’s employees to join the defendant union. While the evidence is explicit of serious damage to plaintiff’s property, it does not necessarily require the inference that the damage was committed by the defendants. Findings and conclusions inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings accordingly will be made, order to be settled on notice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harolds-delicatessen-restaurant-inc-v-stein-nyappdiv-1933.