Harold v. Iron Silver Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

Harold v. Iron Silver Min. Co.

33 F. 529, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2162

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

DecidedJanuary 4, 1888

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 33 F. 529 (Harold v. Iron Silver Min. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harold v. Iron Silver Min. Co., 33 F. 529, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2162 (circtdco 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Hallett, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in the district court of Lake county for damages resulting from the death of her son through defendant’s negligence, while the son was at work in defendant’s mine. The suit is founded on a statute of the state. Alleging that it is a New York corporation, and that plaintiff is a citizen of Great Britain, residing in Ireland, defendant applied in apt time to the district court to remove the cause into this court, and the petition was denied. Defendant now asks to docket the case in this court, and to proceed with it here as properly within the jurisdiction of this court. Th.e question is whether a suit between an alien, residing abroad, and a citizen of New York, may be removed from a court of the state into this court on petition of defendant. In Mining Co. v. Markell, ante, 386, it was held that under the act of 1887, (24 St. 552,) a suit between citizens of different states may be brought only in the district where the plaintiff resides, or where the defendant resides. The same limitation appears to be applicable to a suit between an alien and a citizen of a state. As neither the plaintiff nor defendant is a citizen or resident of the state of Colorado, this court has not jurisdiction of the case. The petition to remove was properly denied in the district court of the state, and the application to docket the cause in this court must be denied. The circuit judge concurs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallett, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in the district court of Lake county for damages resulting from the death of her son through defendant’s negligence, while the son was at work in defendant’s mine. The suit is founded on a statute of the state. Alleging that it is a New York corporation, and that plaintiff is a citizen of Great Britain, residing in Ireland, defendant applied in apt time to the district court to remove the cause into this court, and the petition was denied. Defendant now asks to docket the case in this court, and to proceed with it here as properly within the jurisdiction of this court. Th.e question is whether a suit between an alien, residing abroad, and a citizen of New York, may be removed from a court of the state into this court on petition of defendant. In Mining Co. v. Markell, ante, 386, it was held that under the act of 1887, (24 St. 552,) a suit between citizens of different states may be brought only in the district where the plaintiff resides, or where the defendant resides. The same limitation appears to be applicable to a suit between an alien and a citizen of a state. As neither the plaintiff nor defendant is a citizen or resident of the state of Colorado, this court has not jurisdiction of the case. The petition to remove was properly denied in the district court of the state, and the application to docket the cause in this court must be denied. The circuit judge concurs,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. 529, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-v-iron-silver-min-co-circtdco-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack