HAROLD ST. FELIX v. ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HAROLD ST. FELIX v. ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 2020

Docket19-2098

StatusPublished

This text of HAROLD ST. FELIX v. ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN (HAROLD ST. FELIX v. ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HAROLD ST. FELIX v. ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

HAROLD ST. FELIX, Appellant,

v.

ALBERT HAZEN and JORIE HAZEN, Appellee.

No. 4D19-2098

[April 16, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2018CA009629.

Harold St. Feliz, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Rosemary B. Wilder of Marlow Adler Abrams Newman & Lewis, Coral Gables, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI