Harold Rudisill and Patricia Rudisill v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2018·No. 18-0271·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-271 _____________________________

HAROLD RUDISILL and PATRICIA RUDISILL,

Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. G. W. Chisenhall, Judge.

October 31, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Tyson J. Pulsifer of Finn Law Group, P.A., Largo, for Appellants.

Ross Marshman, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harold Rudisill and Patricia Rudisill v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Harold Rudisill and Patricia Rudisill v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation (Harold Rudisill and Patricia Rudisill v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.