Harold Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
This text of 260 F.2d 958 (Harold Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee upon the ground that the record showed that appellants had failed to comply with the conditions precedent of crop insurance issued to them by appellee. The issue presented on the motion below and again on appeal here was whether or not the appel-lee had lawfully waived or was estopped to require compliance by appellants with the conditions precedent of the insurance contract.
Judge Sam Driver justly and properly disposed of the cause and we adopt his reasons as ours for affirming the judgment.
Affirmed on opinion below, Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, D.C.E.D.Wash.1958, 158 F.Supp. 688.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 F.2d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-roberts-v-federal-crop-insurance-corporation-ca9-1958.