Harold R. Love v. Raymond L. Springer

179 F.2d 239, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2635
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1949
Docket10947
StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.2d 239 (Harold R. Love v. Raymond L. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold R. Love v. Raymond L. Springer, 179 F.2d 239, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2635 (6th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the conditions upon which we granted additional time to the ap *240 pellant for perfecting his record on appeal have not been complied with and that no additional time has been requested within the period of permitted compliance,

It is ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 F.2d 239, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-r-love-v-raymond-l-springer-ca6-1949.