Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 19, 2015
Docket05-15-01416-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. v. State (Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

suae or Thms 0S_l5_a4n,-c£. s itiiwyu^DiwtTcaxx 'S. FILET" i *j #F COURT OF 2,r:>LS

Wi2DL0 Qmw/0r/A)fl^77; 3E nov 19 2B|5 $U//0 fflUiOT/, 7?#& LISA M.' &_. CLERK 5th Di^RICT

Mtu£> nMiMynritwrTyiLk rnrmtosr i/o TAf/iec>ut ITiLCK Md AJWI/3f£C0 CjUSF, BEjt/Otj DULV 5oJ

Pcavi rreo To /iff&tL //u pctim P/iutts.

Dtt&miUT

Swm To A/od •sa&sc^ibeo To sf^A'/Vf 5*/

DELMAI, MURPHY AJOTAdi/ Public •>,.*:.

Nowy Public ^\Q OTMtOF TEXAS 'af^ t»C«Wi.E»P March :^. ^17

(liflLCOCf)} mitAVl^A&XJMSSj p.C. -flu CAUSE NO. 416-82573-2013

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE 416TH DISTRICT COURT

VS. OF

HAROLD QUINNTIN PRATT, JR. COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS

TRIAL COURT'S CERTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT'S RI

I, judge of the trial court, certify this criminal case:

is not a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right of app£ • is a plea-bargain case, but matters were raised by written motiofkmbtfand ruled on before trial and not withdrawn or waived, and the defendanthas the right of appeal. [orL—-> —- • is aplea-bargain case, but the trial court has give^faerw^kon to, appeal, and the defendant has the right of appeal, -r] Nx CJ aplea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO^ghboXappeal. [orj the defendant has waived the right of appeal^ C\\ 7

SIGNED THIS 20

COURT'S COPY SIGNED BY JUDGE JUDGE PRESIDING c I have received a c ification. I have also been informed of my rights concerning any appeal of this criminal case,_incWdmg rjght to file a pro se petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68 of the Texas Rules of Aweilar&xpri ' re. I have been admonished that my attorney must mail a copy of the court of appeals's judgment rN©-fny last known address and that I have only 30 days in which to file a pro se petition for discretionary the Court of Criminal Appeals. Tex. R. App. P. 68.2.1 acknowledge that, if I wish to appeal this case and if I an\erKitled to do so, it is my duty to inform my appellate attorney, by written communication, of any change in the address at which I am currently living or any change in my current prison unit. I understand that, because of appellate deadlines, if I fail to timely inform my appellate attorney of any change in my address, I may lose the opportunity to file a pro se petition for discretionary review.

COURT'S COPY SIGNED BY DEFENDANT COURT'S COPY SIGNED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL Defendant Defendant's Attorney Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. Printed Name: Address: State Bar No.: Address:

Telephone No._ Fax No. (if any): Fax No. (if any):

*"A defendant in a criminal case has the right of appeal under these rules. The trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant's plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal." TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 25.2(a)(2).

Revised: 01/02/2014 ^•^^^^mmmismms^:^'

O m .,••>

d) d) CM O

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harold Quinntin Pratt, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-quinntin-pratt-jr-v-state-texapp-2015.