HAROLD PEERENBOOM v. ROY BLACK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HAROLD PEERENBOOM v. ROY BLACK

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 8, 2023

Docket21-3070

StatusPublished

This text of HAROLD PEERENBOOM v. ROY BLACK (HAROLD PEERENBOOM v. ROY BLACK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HAROLD PEERENBOOM v. ROY BLACK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

HAROLD PEERENBOOM, Appellant,

v.

ROY BLACK, ISAAC PERLMUTTER, LAURA PERLMUTTER, and BLACK SREBNICK, P.A. f/k/a BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A., Appellees.

No. 4D21-3070

[June 8, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cymonie Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2018-CA- 008378-XXXX-MB, 50-2013-CA-015257-XXXX-MB, 50-2014-CA- 006931-XXXX-MB, and 50-2015-CA-001012-XXXX-MB.

Manuel Kushner of the Manuel Kushner Law Firm, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Rodney Janis and David Majcak of Goldberg Segalla, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellees Roy Black and Black Srebnick, P.A.

Paul Morris of the Law Offices of Paul Morris, Miami, Roy Black and Jared Lopez of Black Srebnick, P.A., Miami, and Joshua E. Dubin, Miami, for appellees Isaac and Laura Perlmutter.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI