Harold Mason v. Invision LLC

597 F. App'x 897
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2015
Docket14-3047
StatusUnpublished

This text of 597 F. App'x 897 (Harold Mason v. Invision LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Mason v. Invision LLC, 597 F. App'x 897 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Harold Mason appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment following a bench trial in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(1) (discussing appellant’s duty to order transcript); Van Treese v. Blome, 7 F.3d 729 (8th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (court’s factual findings, refusal to call witnesses, and denial of motions at bench trial cannot be reviewed without transcript).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Treese v. Blome
7 F.3d 729 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
597 F. App'x 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-mason-v-invision-llc-ca8-2015.