Harold Lubell, Inc. v. Brown

Connecticut Superior Court

Harold Lubell, Inc. v. Brown

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 111

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 30, 1936

DocketFile No. 45414

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 (Harold Lubell, Inc. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harold Lubell, Inc. v. Brown, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 111 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendant alleging that he is the owner of a promissory note owed by and due from the defendant.

In his special defense the defendant alleges that the Second National Bank of New Haven has instituted an action against the plaintiff and garnisheed the defendant herein and that said action is now pending.

Such situation might bar execution, but it has no effect upon the present rights of the plaintiff and this defendant.

The demurrer to the special defense of the defendant Paul H. Brown is sustained upon the grounds therein stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendant alleging that he is the owner of a promissory note owed by and due from the defendant.

In his special defense the defendant alleges that the Second National Bank of New Haven has instituted an action against the plaintiff and garnisheed the defendant herein and that said action is now pending.

Such situation might bar execution, but it has no effect upon the present rights of the plaintiff and this defendant.

The demurrer to the special defense of the defendant Paul H. Brown is sustained upon the grounds therein stated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-lubell-inc-v-brown-connsuperct-1936.