Harold Lorimer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2007
Docket07-07-00461-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Harold Lorimer v. State (Harold Lorimer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Lorimer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-00461-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL D


DECEMBER 21, 2007

______________________________


HAROLD LORIMER, APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________


FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


NO. 2002-439,803; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________



Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

          Appellant Harold Lorimer filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for aggravated sexual assault on November 7, 2007. On October 24, 2007, the trial court filed its certification that appellant has the right of appeal. However, the appellate record reflects that appellant failed to sign the certification pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) which requires the certification to be signed by appellant and a copy served on him.

          Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 137th District Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it finds necessary to determine whether:

          1.       Appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

          2.       If so, to obtain his signature on an amended trial court’s certification.

            If necessary, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders, if any, to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk’s record and the supplemental reporter’s record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court by January 21, 2008.

          It is so ordered.

                                                                                      Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harold Lorimer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-lorimer-v-state-texapp-2007.