Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 17, 2010·No. 08-10-00002-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

HAROLD LOCKE, INDIVIDUALLY § AND HAROLD LOCKE & No. 08-10-00002-CV ASSOCIATES, INC., § Appeal from the Appellants, § 136th Judicial District Court v. § of Jefferson County, Texas § CAROLINE MILLER, (TC# D-183,419) § Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties represent they have agreed to set aside the trial court’s

judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Having reviewed the

motion, we conclude the parties have complied with the requirements of TEX .R.APP .P.

42.1(a)(2)(B), and conclude the motion should be GRANTED. Therefore, pursuant to

TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), the trial court’s judgment is hereby set aside without regard to the

merits, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with the parties’

agreement. As the motion does not indicate the parties have agreed otherwise, costs will be

taxed against Appellant. See TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(d).

March 17, 2010 DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller (Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.