Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
HAROLD LOCKE, INDIVIDUALLY § AND HAROLD LOCKE & No. 08-10-00002-CV ASSOCIATES, INC., § Appeal from the Appellants, § 136th Judicial District Court v. § of Jefferson County, Texas § CAROLINE MILLER, (TC# D-183,419) § Appellee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to
TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties represent they have agreed to set aside the trial court’s
judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Having reviewed the
motion, we conclude the parties have complied with the requirements of TEX .R.APP .P.
42.1(a)(2)(B), and conclude the motion should be GRANTED. Therefore, pursuant to
TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), the trial court’s judgment is hereby set aside without regard to the
merits, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with the parties’
agreement. As the motion does not indicate the parties have agreed otherwise, costs will be
taxed against Appellant. See TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(d).
March 17, 2010 DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller (Harold Locke, Individually and Harold Locke & Associates, Inc. v. Caroline Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.