Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America
438 F.2d 534
Opinion
The district court dismissed petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, *535 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America, 438 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1971).
438 F.2d 534 (Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanders v. United States
373 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Frank Gomez v. United States
396 F.2d 323 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)