Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America

Ninth Circuit

Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America

438 F.2d 534

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1971

Docket25044

StatusPublished

This text of 438 F.2d 534 (Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harold Lewis Peek, Jr. v. United States of America, 438 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court dismissed petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, *535 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court dismissed petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, *535 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-lewis-peek-jr-v-united-states-of-america-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack