Harold Leroy Montgomery v. C. H. Looney, Warden
This text of 268 F.2d 219 (Harold Leroy Montgomery v. C. H. Looney, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
268 F.2d 219
Harold LeRoy MONTGOMERY
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden.
No. 6066.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
March 25, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.
Alfred P. Davis, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., and Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Edmond, Okl., and George Camp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.
Before MURRAH, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without written opinion, since the court was convinced that the petitioner voluntarily entered his plea of guilty upon which the judgment of the lower court rests.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-leroy-montgomery-v-c-h-looney-warden-ca10-1959.