Harold Leroy Montgomery v. C. H. Looney, Warden

268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4172
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1959
Docket6066
StatusPublished

This text of 268 F.2d 219 (Harold Leroy Montgomery v. C. H. Looney, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Leroy Montgomery v. C. H. Looney, Warden, 268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4172 (10th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

268 F.2d 219

Harold LeRoy MONTGOMERY
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden.

No. 6066.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 25, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Alfred P. Davis, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Paul W. Cress, U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., and Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty., Edmond, Okl., and George Camp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, since the court was convinced that the petitioner voluntarily entered his plea of guilty upon which the judgment of the lower court rests.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F.2d 219, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-leroy-montgomery-v-c-h-looney-warden-ca10-1959.