Harold Ladd Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc., a Corporation, and Antonio J. Almeida

Ninth Circuit

Harold Ladd Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc., a Corporation, and Antonio J. Almeida

226 F.2d 204

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 3, 1955·No. 14232·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action, No. 14,232, was consolidated on appeal with the ease of Pierce *205 v. Muehleisen and Muehleisen Perlite Processing, Inc., No. 14,184, 9 Cir., 226 F.2d 200. The validity of the same patent, No. 2,501,962, was in issue in both cases and in each held invalid. What we have said in case No. 14,184 has application to the instant case. Upon authority of case No. 14,184 the judgment in this case, No. 14,232, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action, No. 14,232, was consolidated on appeal with the ease of Pierce *205 v. Muehleisen and Muehleisen Perlite Processing, Inc., No. 14,184, 9 Cir., 226 F.2d 200. The validity of the same patent, No. 2,501,962, was in issue in both cases and in each held invalid. What we have said in case No. 14,184 has application to the instant case. Upon authority of case No. 14,184 the judgment in this case, No. 14,232, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Harold Ladd Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc., a Corporation, and Antonio J. Almeida, 226 F.2d 204 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

226 F.2d 204 (Harold Ladd Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc., a Corporation, and Antonio J. Almeida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related