Harold Konigsberg v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Warden
This text of 420 F.2d 699 (Harold Konigsberg v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his motion to reopen. The petition for habeas corpus relates to various complaints as to conditions the petitioner was “forced to tolerate” at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners. The trial. court held a pretrial conference and conducted an evidentiary hearing from December 16 through December 20, 1968. After the hearing the parties reached certain agreements to better enable petitioner to work on his legal briefs in other pending litigation. On December 31, 1968, the district court dismissed the petition without prejudice to refile at future dates as to future complaints.
This court has reviewed the many claims of petitioner and the - entire record below. We find that the appeal of petitioner is without merit and should be dismissed as frivolous.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-konigsberg-v-dr-p-j-ciccone-warden-ca8-1970.