Harold I. McQueen v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Harold I. McQueen v. United States

262 F.2d 455, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 358, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3448

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1958

Docket14598_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 F.2d 455 (Harold I. McQueen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harold I. McQueen v. United States, 262 F.2d 455, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 358, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3448 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

*456 PER CURIAM.

Appellant McQueen was indicted, tried and convicted for robbery. At about three o’clock one morning two police officers heard shots and ran to the scene. They saw a man (later identified as “Lee Bong”) in a yard waving a pistol and yelling, “You robbed me; you robbed me.” The officers saw McQueen leaving a shed in the yard. Later they found a wallet in a trash can beside the shed. Lee Bong identified it as his. While still on the scene McQueen admitted his guilt to the offense. Lee Bong died of a heart attack shortly after this affair and so was not a witness at the trial.

Upon this appeal counsel for McQueen raises several points about the admissibility of evidence, particularly with regard to the officers’ testimony concerning Lee Bong’s utterances on the scene. We find no error. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Cf. Guthrie v. United States, 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 207 F.2d 19.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*456 PER CURIAM.

Appellant McQueen was indicted, tried and convicted for robbery. At about three o’clock one morning two police officers heard shots and ran to the scene. They saw a man (later identified as “Lee Bong”) in a yard waving a pistol and yelling, “You robbed me; you robbed me.” The officers saw McQueen leaving a shed in the yard. Later they found a wallet in a trash can beside the shed. Lee Bong identified it as his. While still on the scene McQueen admitted his guilt to the offense. Lee Bong died of a heart attack shortly after this affair and so was not a witness at the trial.

Upon this appeal counsel for McQueen raises several points about the admissibility of evidence, particularly with regard to the officers’ testimony concerning Lee Bong’s utterances on the scene. We find no error. 1

Affirmed.

1

. Cf. Guthrie v. United States, 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 207 F.2d 19.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F.2d 455, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 358, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-i-mcqueen-v-united-states-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack