Harold Hunter Jr v. David Sisco

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 21, 2014
Docket147335
StatusPublished

This text of Harold Hunter Jr v. David Sisco (Harold Hunter Jr v. David Sisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Hunter Jr v. David Sisco, (Mich. 2014).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 21, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147335(52) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra HAROLD HUNTER, JR., Bridget M. McCormack Plaintiff-Appellant, David F. Viviano, Justices v SC: 147335 COA: 306018 Genesee CC: 10-094081-NI DAVID SISCO and AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Defendants, and CITY OF FLINT TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 20, 2013 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE that part of our November 20, 2013 order that denied the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether damages for pain and suffering and/or emotional distress may qualify as a “bodily injury” that permits a plaintiff to avoid the application of governmental immunity from tort liability under the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1405 (see Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 480 Mich 75 (2008)).

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in Hannay v Dept of Transportation (Docket No. 146763).

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Insurance Institute of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 21, 2014 d0319 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesche v. Mecosta County Road Commission
746 N.W.2d 847 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harold Hunter Jr v. David Sisco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-hunter-jr-v-david-sisco-mich-2014.