Harold Huffman v. Union Pacific Railroad
This text of 683 F.3d 619 (Harold Huffman v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 3 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Dennis, Elrod, and Graves), and 12 judges voted against rehearing (Jones, King, Jolly, Davis, Garza, Stewart, Clement, Prado, Owen, South-wick, Haynes, and Higginson).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 F.3d 619, 2012 WL 2036857, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-huffman-v-union-pacific-railroad-ca5-2012.