Harold Huffman v. Union Pacific Railroad

683 F.3d 619, 2012 WL 2036857, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11470
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 2012
Docket09-40736
StatusPublished

This text of 683 F.3d 619 (Harold Huffman v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Huffman v. Union Pacific Railroad, 683 F.3d 619, 2012 WL 2036857, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11470 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinions

[620]*620PER CURIAM:

The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, 3 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Dennis, Elrod, and Graves), and 12 judges voted against rehearing (Jones, King, Jolly, Davis, Garza, Stewart, Clement, Prado, Owen, South-wick, Haynes, and Higginson).

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, did not participate in consideration of the rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lane v. R.A. Sims, Jr., Inc.
241 F.3d 439 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Rivera v. Union Pacific Railroad
378 F.3d 502 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
The Robert Edwards
19 U.S. 187 (Supreme Court, 1821)
Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.
321 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1944)
Lavender v. Kurn
327 U.S. 645 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
352 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.
364 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
372 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Gottshall
512 U.S. 532 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Johnson v. Cenac Towing, Inc.
544 F.3d 296 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. McBride
180 L. Ed. 2d 637 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 F.3d 619, 2012 WL 2036857, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-huffman-v-union-pacific-railroad-ca5-2012.