Harold Hogan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
This text of Harold Hogan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Harold Hogan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 15, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160035 & (48) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra HAROLD HOGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff, Elizabeth T. Clement and Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., doing business as DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 160035 v COA: 343654 Wayne CC: 16-010956-NI KORA MOMINEE-BURKE Defendant, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. The motion to hold the case in abeyance is denied as moot.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 15, 2019
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harold Hogan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-hogan-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-mich-2019.