Harold Hiram Hartness v. United States
This text of 328 F.2d 992 (Harold Hiram Hartness v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
328 F.2d 992
Harold Hiram HARTNESS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 20554.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
March 20, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; William A. Bootle, Chief Judge.
John M. Hancock, Jr., W. O. Cooper, Jr., Macon, Ga., for appellant.
Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the record in this case and find that the grounds of appeal are without merit.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F.2d 992, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-hiram-hartness-v-united-states-ca5-1964.