Harold Earl Reed v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Harold Earl Reed v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-15-01080-CR
Trial court case number: 1404938
Trial court: 228th District Court of Harris County
The clerk’s record was filed on February 3, 2016. Our review of the clerk’s record reveals that a relevant item has been omitted. Rule 34.5(c)(1) authorizes us to request the filing of a supplemental clerk’s record containing the omitted item. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). The document omitted from the clerk’s record is the judgment of conviction, signed on July 17, 2014, and containing handwritten notations dated October 9, 2015, revising sentencing.
Accordingly, we direct the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record within 10 days of the date of this order containing the judgment of conviction, signed on July 17, 2014, which includes the October 9, 2015 handwritten notations revising sentencing (identified on the Harris County District Clerk’s website as image #68526815 “Judgment”).
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale Acting individually
Date: October 25, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harold Earl Reed v. State (Harold Earl Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.