Harold Brown v. David Burk Md

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2012·No. 144498·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 25, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 144498 & (44) Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly HAROLD BROWN and NORMA BROWN, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices

v SC: 144498 COA: 298994 Ogemaw CC: 08-656968-NH DAVID BURK, M.D., RICHARD WACKSMAN, M.D., and BAY EYE CARE CENTER, PC, Defendants-Appellees, and CHARLES ZENZEN, M.D., Defendant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 25, 2012 _________________________________________ d0618 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harold Brown v. David Burk Md, (Mich. 2012).

Harold Brown v. David Burk Md (Harold Brown v. David Burk Md) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.