Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 18, 2011
Docket13-11-00348-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson (Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-11-00348-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

HAROLD BOENIG,                                                                          Appellant,

                                                             v.

JOHN P. JACKSON AND DEBORAH K. JACKSON,                  Appellees.

                              On Appeal from the 24th District Court

                                        of Refugio County, Texas.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Harold Boenig, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Refugio County, Texas, in cause number 2008-2-10698.  The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached a settlement agreement.  The parties request that this Court dismiss this appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

18th day of August, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harold Boenig v. John P. Jackson and Deborah K. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-boenig-v-john-p-jackson-and-deborah-k-jacks-texapp-2011.