Harold A. Durel v. The Southern Pacific Railroad, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Intervenor-Appellee

444 F.2d 529, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9293
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 25, 1971·No. 31028·Published

Opinion

444 F.2d 529

Harold A. DUREL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee,
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 31028 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 25, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Richard J. Putnam, District Judge.

Gibson Tucker, Jr., New Orleans, La., Howard B. DeJean, Jr., Opelousas, La., Tucker & Schonekas, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard C. Meaux, Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, Lafayette, La., for Southern Pacific.

Patrick A. Juneau, Jr., Lafayette, La., for Aetna.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

Notes:

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.;see Isbell Enterprises v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y., 431 F. 2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harold A. Durel v. The Southern Pacific Railroad, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Intervenor-Appellee, 444 F.2d 529, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9293 (5th Cir. 1971).

444 F.2d 529 (Harold A. Durel v. The Southern Pacific Railroad, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Intervenor-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related