Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Greyhound Corporation

309 F.2d 397, 51 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 1962
Docket19755_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 F.2d 397 (Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Greyhound Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Greyhound Corporation, 309 F.2d 397, 51 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

309 F.2d 397

Harold A. BOIRE, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National
Labor Relations Board, Appellant,
v.
The GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 19755.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1962.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for appellant.

Warren E. Hall, Jr., Chesterfield H. Smith, Wofford H. Stidham, Bartow, Fla., for appellee.

Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga. (Wilson, Branch & Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel) as amicus curiae and on behalf of Floors, Inc.

I. J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (Zimrign, Gromfine & Sternstein, Washington, D.C., of counsel) as amicus curiae, and on behalf of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO.

Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the district court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 686. We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 F.2d 397, 51 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-a-boire-regional-director-twelfth-region-national-labor-ca5-1962.