Harold A. Bates v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company

392 F.2d 591, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 25, 1968·No. 32083·Published

Opinion

392 F.2d 591

Harold A. BATES, Appellant,
v.
MERCHANTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 407.

Docket 32083.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 11, 1968.

Decided April 25, 1968.

Appeal by plaintiff in diversity action against insurance company from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered December 16, 1967 after a non-jury trial before Hon. Edmund Port in the Northern District of New York.

Bonney & Nicit, Waterloo, N. Y., on the brief, for appellant.

John C. Kinney, Syracuse, N. Y. (Bond, Schoeneck & King and John M. Freyer, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment in favor of the defendant in this diversity action wherein the plaintiff insured sought to recover from the insurance company for bad faith failure to settle two claims within policy limits, for the reasons stated in Judge Port's opinion below, reported at 277 F.Supp. 308 (N.D.N.Y.1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harold A. Bates v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, 392 F.2d 591, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7193 (2d Cir. 1968).

392 F.2d 591 (Harold A. Bates v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bates v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company
277 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. New York, 1967)