Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.
This text of 676 So. 2d 1 (Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to quash service of process. The trial court’s order is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to refile his motion at such time as there is evidence of attempted or purported service upon him individually. At this time Appellant’s motion to quash is premature as, to date, the only indication in the record concerning service is the service upon a codefendant corporation. There is no evidence of any claim of service upon Appellant individually.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 So. 2d 1, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1995 WL 59550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harnishfager-v-independent-travel-agencies-of-america-inc-fladistctapp-1995.