Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.
676 So. 2d 1, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1995 WL 59550
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1995·No. No. 94-2977·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to quash service of process. The trial court’s order is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to refile his motion at such time as there is evidence of attempted or purported service upon him individually. At this time Appellant’s motion to quash is premature as, to date, the only indication in the record concerning service is the service upon a codefendant corporation. There is no evidence of any claim of service upon Appellant individually.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc., 676 So. 2d 1, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1995 WL 59550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
676 So. 2d 1 (Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braggs v. State
789 So. 2d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
State v. Brady
685 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Motes v. State
684 So. 2d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mosely v. State
682 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Kaplan v. State
681 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Allen v. State
676 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Humphries v. State
676 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mungin v. State
689 So. 2d 1026 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)